Home
Yard



House GOP unveiling plan to balance budget with GIANT reforms, cuts...



The Michigan GOP actually HAS a plan of action... and it's not "cut taxes for the wealthiest 1% and let everyone else stand under them and wait for it to trickle down".


And, this is why I vote Republican occassionally in the state elections. Of course, I'm sure we'll be hearing about the burrs waiting to stick us once the Democrats pour over the budget, but at least it shows that one group of GOP-ers are thinking... and giving us some actual options - unlike our Federal Republicans who like to present budget proposals with no numbers.

Support from within the State Department

  • Jan. 27th, 2009 at 8:16 PM
Yard

It's heartening to see that the "everyday-folks" who work in State are aware of and in opposition to the selected discrimination against same-sex partners of officials living and working in other nations. From Americablog.com:

emphasis mine -


The Honorable Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary of State
U.S. Department of State
2201 C Street NW
Washington, DC 20520

Madam Secretary:

We congratulate you on your Senate confirmation, and we look forward to working with you in promoting America’s interests and strengthening our national security in this rapidly changing world. Whether assigned stateside or overseas, Civil Service or Foreign Service, active or retired, we are all proud to be serving our nation.

We, the undersigned and representing the diversity of the foreign affairs agencies, would like to bring to your attention a matter that concerns us all. All of us are troubled that our families are not all treated equally and with the same respect.
We are concerned that access to the federal health care insurance program is denied to same-sex partners of employees serving in Third World countries with substandard medical care. We question the logic of leaving same-sex partners to fend for themselves during an emergency evacuation of a high danger post. We are embarrassed when the Department will reimburse a variety of moving expenses, including the cost of transporting a pet, when an employee is assigned overseas, but will not do the same for a same-sex partner. We are saddened that individual and community safety are put at risk because full language instruction is not available to same-sex partners. We are uncomfortable that same-sex partners receive less compensation and fewer benefits for performing exactly the same job inside the mission as an opposite-sex spouse, that is, when same-sex partners are given a chance to work.

An order from your office designating same-sex partners as Eligible Family Members (EFMs) could remedy many of the inequalities that these families face. Other remedies will require coordination between the Executive and Legislative branches.

Madam Secretary, we believe that no colleague of ours is a second-class colleague, and no colleague's family is a second-class family. Given your commitment to protecting the safety and promoting the welfare of all Foreign Service families, we ask for your full consideration of our concerns and we hope that a dialogue aimed at ending this unequal treatment can be started.

Your loyal staff


Yes, you've read that right. Our government will pay to relocate PETS, but not same-gender partners... outrageous. And I like how if you happen to be the same-gender spouse of a diplomat and the embassy gets attacked, you're just supposed to look after yourself. While waving goodbye to the other spouses as they're air-lifted out, I'm sure.

Well, at least when they need emergency medical care, same-gender spouses can look up an understaffed, underfunded, poorly stocked and maintained 3rd world doctor to take care of 'em... nothing but the best!

And what is the response from the new State Department: (from WaPo.com)

A State Department official said Clinton had received the letter. "The secretary wants to review this soon and plans to hear from all relevant stakeholders," he added.
Gee, thanks. Don't hurt yourself trying to correct this wrong or anything. And, just what "stakeholders" do you need to 'hear from'?! This clearly falls within the purvue of the Secretary of State's discretion; she needs to hear opposing views why exactly?

Writer's Block: Regime Change

  • Jan. 20th, 2009 at 4:28 PM
Yard

Today marks the inauguration of Barack Obama as the 44th President of the United States. Obama's campaign was built around a message of change. What changes would you most like to see in the next 4 years?


View 500 Answers

REPEAL "don't ask/don't tell" and the "defense of marriage act". And, of course, bringing manufacturing back to the United States of America and making this a great country of builders again... instead of a pack of Wall Street sharks and lawyers.
Yard

Okay, so maybe the "don't ask, don't tell" policy the military uses to enforce secrecy on our gay service members isn't going to be overturned anytime soon, despite the fact that Israel and Great Britain's armed forces don't see to suffer any when gays openly serve. But once in a while, we do have some small reason to hope that things are changing enough in civil society for our strong, proud, military members to also receive the respect they deserve.

Maybe, all it's really going to take is more 'witnesses', like this one:


          .... bitch.

Elaine Donnelly, a crusader against gays in the military, torpedoes her own ship. (By Melina Mara -- The Washington Post)

Read the full story ....  Sorry We Asked, Sorry You Told   By Dana Milbank
Thursday, July 24, 2008 - Washington Post

Remember, it wasn't all that long ago that bullshit like this wench spews would have been taken as self-evident truths.

Profile

Yard
[info]harsens_rob
harsens_rob

Tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Lilia Ahner